Diagnosis of surveillance, prevention, and control of COVID-19 in Peruvian mining work

Introduction: In Peru, mining companies had to register and implement the Plan for the surveillance, prevention, and control of COVID-19 at work (requested by the Ministry of Health), prior to restarting activities suspended due to the pandemic. Objective: To describe the situational status of the plans for the surveillance, prevention, and control of COVID-19 at work in the mining sector (1st and 2nd phases of economic reactivation, 2020). Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out of the database from the SISCOVID-Empresas system. Frequencies and proportions of the characteristics of the plans were reported (region of origin, number of workers, number of health professionals, existence of an occupational health and safety committee or supervisor, status of registration and budget report) according to the number of company workers. Results: In total 2,236 plan records were reviewed. Of the total, 6.2% of the registered plans indicate that they do not have an occupational health and safety supervisor or committee, and 71.5% do not have a health professional. Furthermore, 81.2% of the companies with more than 500 workers had medicine and nursing professionals, and 89.2% of companies with 1 to 20 workers did not have health professionals. Conclusions: Three out of 4 companies in the mining sector fail to comply with the requirements of the plan for the surveillance, prevention, and control of COVID-19 at work. © 2023, Editorial Ciencias Medicas. All rights reserved.

Impact of the NRF2 activator, stabilised synthetic sulforaphane, on systemic inflammation in COVID19: results from the STAR-COVID19 trial

Introduction: Dysregulated immune responses are implicated in the pathogenesis of severe COVID19 and may be modulated by the transcription factor Nrf2. Hypothesis: Treatment with stabilised, synthetic sulforaphane (S-SFN)-an Nrf2 inducer-improves clinical status in hospitalised patients with suspected COVID19 pneumonia by curbing the inflammatory response. Method(s): Double-blind RCT of S-SFN (300mg, once daily, 14 days;EudraCT 2020-003486-19) in patients hospitalised with confirmed or suspected COVID19, in Dundee, UK. The primary outcome was the 7 point WHO Clinical Status scale at day 15. Blood samples were taken on days 1, 8 and 15 for measurement of 45 serum cytokines using the Olink Target48 panel. Key neutrophil functions were assessed including migration, phagocytosis and bacterial killing. Result(s): 133 participants were randomized (placebo n=68, S-SFN n=65) from Nov 2020 to May 2021. S-SFN treatment did not improve clinical status at day 15 (adjusted OR 0.87 95%CI 0.41-1.83). In serum, Nrf2 target TGFalpha was significantly increased at day 15 in those receiving S-SFN treatment compared with placebo (p=0.004;linear mixed effects model). Other targets implicated in cytokine storm, including IL6, IL1beta and TNFalpha, were unchanged. Patients receiving Tocilizumab (n=20) were excluded from exploratory analyses due to a strong impact upon IL6 levels, leading to significant increases at day 8 across the study population (p=0.015). S-SFN treatment did not significantly affect neutrophil function. Conclusion(s): S-SFN treatment modulated select Nrf2 targets but did not modulate key cytokines. Further analyses to delineate drug activity are ongoing.

Dipeptidyl Peptidase-1 Inhibition in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19: a Multicentre Randomized Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial

Background: Neutrophil serine proteases (NSPs) are involved in the pathogenesis of COVID19 and are increased in severe and fatal infection. We investigated whether treatment with Brensocatib, an inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-1, an enzyme responsible for the activation of NSPs, would improve outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID19. Method(s): In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 406 hospitalized patients with COVID19 with at least one risk factor for severe disease were randomized 1:1 to once-daily Brensocatib 25mg (n=192) or placebo (n=214) for 28 days. Primary outcome was the 7-point World Health Organisation Clinical Status scale at day 29. Secondary outcomes included time to clinical improvement, national early warning score, new oxygen and ventilation use, neutrophil elastase activity in blood and mortality. Finding(s): Brensocatib treatment was associated with worse clinical status at day 29 (adjusted odds ratio 0 72, 95%CI 0 57-0 92) compared to placebo. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for time to clinical improvement was 0 87 (95%CI 0 76-1 00) and time to hospital discharge was 0 98 (95%CI 0 84-1 13). During the 28-day follow-up period, 23 (11%) and 29 (15%) patients died in the placebo and Brensocatib treated groups respectively). Oxygen and new ventilation use were greater in the Brensocatib treated patients. Neutrophil elastase activity in blood was significantly reduced in the Brensocatib group from baseline to day 29. Prespecified subgroup analyses of the primary outcome supported the primary results.

Investigating neutrophil AMPK activity in COVID-19 and pneumonia

Introduction: COVID19 can cause neutrophilic inflammation and reaction oxygen species (ROS) production, leading to acute lung injury and mortality. AMPK is a key regulator of cellular energy with profound effects on neutrophil function. This study aims to investigate the role of AMPK activity in neutrophils during COVID-19 and pneumonia caused by pathogens other than SARS-CoV-2. Method(s): Patients hospitalised due to pneumonia or COVID-19 were recruited from Ninewells Hospital (Dundee, UK). Blood was sampled at day 1, 8, and 15. ROS production, phospho-AMPK (pAMPK), and NQO1 were stained in neutrophils, and then analysed by flow cytometry. The endogenous AMPK inhibitor, resistin, was quantified by ELISA, in serum (day 1, 8, 15). WHO clinical scale and CURB65 score were utilised to define severity. Result(s): 133 patients were enrolled (mean age 63.6 years). Resistin was not different between pneumonia and COVID-19 on day1. However, day 1 resistin was higher in severe disease defined by CURB65 Score (p=0.0220) and WHO score (p=0.0184). Resistin reduced over time at day 1 (mean 63.1pg/mL;n=121) to day 15 (mean 59.5pg/mL;n=66)(p=0.0002). Zymosan stimulation significantly increases neutrophil ROS production (p<0.0001), and significantly decreases NQO1 (p<0.0001), but caused no changes with pAMPK. There were no changes in these markers over time. pAMPK significantly correlated with NQO1 in unstimulated neutrophils (p=0.0388), but not when stimulated with zymosan. There were no associations between resistin and pAMPK, and no difference in these markers between pneumonia and COVID-19 groups. Conclusion(s): Our study suggests resistin as a marker of severity and disease course in COVID-19, independent of neutrophil AMPK signalling.

Virtual Laboratory, a Learning Resource for Distance Education

Distance education programs have grown rapidly in recent years and have become even more massive because of the restrictions on movement due to the covid 19 pandemic. The development of information technologies has helped this teaching modality to have good results due to its autonomy and flexibility, however, it has some points of improvement especially in activities of practical nature. Virtual laboratories appear as a tool to support this type of activities. The success of these laboratories depends on several factors, not only imitating a face-to-face laboratory. This article proposes a methodology to guide the process of design and development of immersive experiences that allow the realization of laboratory activities in distance education mode. The objective is to ensure that the development of this type of experience becomes a resource to help the teaching-learning process, ensuring its contribution to the achievement of learning outcomes, allowing the validation of the knowledge acquired by students and helping the professor in the teaching of the course. The proposed methodology considers the opinion of the coordinating committee of the distance education program, students and professors. Its application is presented through a case study of a distance education program of an industrial engineering school in a Chilean university. © 2022 IEEE.

Stabilised, synthetic sulforaphane in hospitalized patients with suspected COVID-19 pneumonia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT

Introduction: The transcription factor Nrf2 downregulates key inflammatory cytokines in COVID-19 (IL-6, IL-1b, COX-2 and TNF-a). We investigated the efficacy of S-SFN (stabilised sulforaphane, activator of Nrf2) to improve clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with suspected COVID-19. Method(s): Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients hospitalised with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, radiological pneumonia and a CURB65 score of >= 1 were randomized 1:1 to once-daily S-SFN 300mg or placebo for 14 days. The primary outcome was the 7-point WHO Clinical Status (CS) scale at day 15. Key secondary outcomes included time to clinical improvement, national early warning score (NEWS), oxygen and ventilation use, and mortality. Result(s): The trial was terminated due to futility after 133 patients had been enrolled (S-SFN, n=65 and placebo, n=68). 103 had PCR confirmed COVID-19 infection. S-SFN treatment was not associated with improved CS at day 15 (OR 0.87 95%CI (0.41-1.83, p=0.712). There was no difference in time to clinical improvement (HR 1.02 (0.70- 1.49)). S-SFN was not associated with a reduced length of hospital stay (6.2days vs 7.4days (S-SFN)). There were 26 deaths during the 29-day follow-up, 11 (16.2%) and 15 (23.1%) patients died in the placebo and S-SFN treated groups respectively (HR 1.45 (0.67-3.16)). There were no differences between treatment groups with respect to oxygen or ventilation free days. Adverse events were reported in 44.1% of placebo treated and 64.6% of S-SFN treated patients. Conclusion(s): S-SFN treatment did not improve day 15 clinical status in hospitalized patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection.

Longitudinal profiling of the peripheral blood transcriptome identifies risk of Major Cardiac Events after Hospitalization for COVID-19

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2 infection has profound effects on endothelial and immune cell function and coagulation, and better understanding of these events in COVID-19 would allow for targeted cardiovascular treatment and followup. Method(s): Longitudinal observational study of patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to hospital at two UK sites. Patients were enrolled within 96 hours of admission, with sampling up to day 29. RNAstabilised whole blood was processed for mRNA sequencing. Gene expression levels were compared between patients who did and did not suffer a major cardiac event (MACE) from admission to 1-year post-hospitalization. Result(s): At day 1, in acute COVID-19, no differences in gene expression were observed between those with (n=23) and without (n=140) a MACE. However, 93 significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs;adjusted pvalue<0.05;Wald test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction) were identified at day 29 between patients who suffered a MACE (n=16) or not (n=85) post-hospitalization. Neutrophil elastase (ELANE), tissue factor pathways inhibitor (TFPI) and integrin subunit alpha-2 (ITGA2B) were significantly elevated in patients who suffered a MACE. Significantly enriched pathways associated with cardiovascular events included type I interferon signalling and neutrophil chemotaxis. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 patients who experienced a MACE demonstrated significant changes in peripheral blood transcriptome 29 days after hospital admission. Significant DEGs were related to neutrophil activity, coagulation and interferon signalling, suggesting a relationship between these pathways and increased cardiovascular risk.

Altered neutrophil proteomes in COVID19 patients 29-days post hospital admission are associated with delayed recovery: results from the PREDICT-COVID19 study

Introduction and ObjectivesNeutrophils are increasingly recognised for a role in acute COVID19, contributing to hyperinflammatory responses, immunothrombosis and tissue damage. However, less is known about the cellular changes occurring within neutrophils in acute disease, as well as neutrophil function in patients recovering from COVID19. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics of neutrophils from hospitalised COVID19 patients sampled longitudinally was utilised to characterise these cells in both acute and long COVID19 (i.e. symptoms for ≥4 weeks).MethodsProspective observational study of hospitalised patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (May 2020–December 2020). Patients were enrolled within 96 hours of admission, with longitudinal sampling up to day 29. Control groups comprised hospitalised patients with non-COVID19 acute respiratory infection and age-matched non-infected controls. Neutrophils isolated from peripheral blood were processed for mass spectrometry. COVID19 severity was defined using the WHO 7-point ordinal scale.Results84 COVID19 patients were included (mean age±SD 65.5±14.6 years;52.4% male), 91 non-COVID19 respiratory infection patients (age 65.7±16.7 years;49.5% male) and 42 non-infected controls (age 58.5±17.9;40% male). 1,748 proteins were significantly different (q-value≤0.05) in COVID19 neutrophils compared to those of non-infected controls. Major differences included a robust interferon response at baseline, with markers of neutrophil immaturity (CD10, CD71), increased neutrophil activation (CD64), and changes in metabolism which associated with COVID19 disease severity. Delayed recovery (WHO score 2–3) at day 29 was associated with significant changes in 1,107 proteins compared to the control population. Features of non-recovery included significantly reduced abundance of migratory receptors (e.g. C3AR1, LTB4R), integrins (CD11b, CD18), inhibitory molecules (e.g. SHP-1, SHIP-1) and indications of increased activation (CD64). Overall, ficolin and specific granule content was decreased in COVID19 patient neutrophils at day 29 compared with controls, however, comparing those who had recovered and those who had not, granule content was found to be significantly lower in the non-recovery group.ConclusionNeutrophils undergo significant changes in acute COVID19 associated with disease severity. Neutrophil proteomics revealed that these cells may have an ongoing role in non-recovered patients, including profiles associated with increased potential for neutrophil activation and reduced migratory capacity, highlighting neutrophils as potential therapeutic targets in long COVID19.

Results from the STAR-COVID19 trial, a double-blind RCT of stabilised, synthetic sulforaphane in hospitalised patients with suspected COVID19

Introduction and ObjectivesThe transcription factor, Nrf2, can directly promote beneficial anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory responses. In the STAR-COVID19 trial, hospitalised patients with confirmed or suspected COVID19 were treated with stabilised, synthetic sulforaphane (S-SFN)—an Nrf2 inducer—to evaluate impact on clinical status and systemic inflammation.MethodsDouble-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of S-SFN (300 mg S-SFN or placebo once daily for 14 days;allocation ratio 1:1;EudraCT 2020–003486-19) in Dundee, UK. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, suspected or confirmed COVID19 or pneumonia and CURB65 score ≥1. The primary outcome was the 7-point WHO Clinical Status scale at day 15. Secondary outcomes included time to clinical improvement, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Blood samples were taken on days 1, 8 and 15 for exploratory analyses. To assess Nrf2 activity and inflammation, 45 serum cytokines were measured using the Olink Target48 panel and mRNA sequencing of peripheral blood leukocytes performed. Further, as key immune cells in COVID19 responses, select neutrophil functions such as migration, phagocytosis and extracellular trap formation were evaluated.Results133 participants (77.4% PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection) were randomized from Nov 2020 to May 2021. 68 received placebo (61.8% male;age 63.6±13.8) and 65 received S-SFN (53.8% male;age 61.6±12.7).S-SFN treatment did not improve clinical status at day 15 (Intention-to-treat population;adjusted OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.41–1.83, p=0.712) and the trial was terminated due to futility. Time to clinical improvement (adjusted HR 1.02(0.70–1.49)), length of hospital stay (aHR 0.84(0.56–1.26)), or 29-day mortality (aHR 1.45(0.67–3.16)) were not improved with S-SFN treatment.230 samples in total were utilised for serum cytokine measurement;Nrf2 targets implicated in cytokine storm, including IL6, IL1β and TNFα, were not significantly changed by S-„SFN treatment. Interestingly, serum TGFα was significantly increased at day 15 in those receiving S-SFN compared with placebo (p=0.004;linear mixed effects model). S-SFN treatment did not significantly affect neutrophil functions investigated.ConclusionS-SFN treatment did not improve clinical status at day 15 or modulate key inflammatory cytokines—however, changes in other factors were indicated. Further analyses, including transcriptomics, to delineate drug activity are currently ongoing.

A rare case of an acute ascending longitudinally extensive necrotizing transverse myelitis in a young woman: a severe post-COVID-19 infection neurological complication

Objective: N/A Background: Neurological injuries from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) are becoming recognized in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Pathophysiology processes include a hyperinflammatory immune response due to the affinity of COVID-19 to human ACE2 receptors and multi-organ failure. CASE REPORT: This report highlights a unique presentation of a rapidly progressive, hyperacute to chronic, necrotizing transverse myelitis with associated COVID-19 long haul syndrome in a 31-year-old Venezuelan obese woman without other vascular risk factors. There was a preceding symptomatic COVID-19 infection. Symptoms included headaches, dysgeusia, asymmetric ascending proximal more than distal paresis, lumbago with dysesthesias, autonomic dysautonomia, hyperreflexia with clonus, and severe functional mobility impairment. Results: Neuraxis imaging showed a longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) with T7-T9 enhancement and expansion throughout the thoracic spine (T4-T11). CSF studies showed lymphocytic pleocytosis with elevated protein. Aggressive empiric treatment included 1G of IV methylprednisolone, plasmapheresis (PLEX), and high-dose cyclophosphamide given the life-threatening progression of clinical symptoms. Repeat imaging post-treatment showed expansion of lesions to the cervical cord with sparing of the brainstem, stabilizing after cyclophosphamide initiation. Clinically, there was partial recovery of upper extremity sensation and strength. A T5-T6 tissue biopsy showed evidence of necrotizing myelitis with extensive neutrophil and lymphocyte infiltration. Given clinical progression, a repeat round of immunosuppression, including a monoclonal complement antibody, was pursued. Post-rehabilitation, the patient's symptoms improved above the thoracic spine but not below it. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the most severe form of COVID-19 associated necrotizing myelitis ever reported. Future research may clarify the molecular pathways that trigger neurological injury in patients with severe COVID-19 infection-associated spinal cord complications and increase therapeutic options.

SURVEILLANCE, PREVENTION, AND CONTROL POLICIES OF COVID-19 IN HEALTH SECTOR WORKERS IN PERU

Background: Peru has been one of the countries with the highest burden of disease due to COVID-19. The Government of Peru has established basic guidelines for the preparation and registration of plans for the surveillance, prevention, and control of COVID-19 at work (PVPC) of Peruvian institutions. Objective:To characterize the PVPC of health sector institutions in Peru. Materials and Methods: retrospective descriptive secondary database study. The PVPCs of the health sector registered in the SISCOVID-Empresas platform of the Ministry of Health of Peru, mandatory registration for the reactivation of activities during the COVID-19 pandemic, were evaluated. Results: 1263 PVPC records from the health sector registered on the SISCOVID-Empresas platform were analyzed. Of the registered PVPCs, 5.8% of companies do not have a supervisor or committee for occupational safety and health, and 38.6% of companies with more than 20 workers do not have a health professional. Conclusions: A high non-compliance with what is required in the PVPCs in institutions of the Peruvian health sector was identified. It is necessary to reinforce and supervise the adequate fulfillment of the PVPC in these institutions.

Cancer control in Latin America and the Caribbean: recent advances and opportunities to move forward

The increasing burden of cancer represents a substantial problem for Latin America and the Caribbean. Two Lancet Oncology Commissions in 2013 and 2015 highlighted potential interventions that could advance cancer care in the region by overcoming existing challenges. Areas requiring improvement included insufficient investment in cancer control, non-universal health coverage, fragmented health systems, inequitable concentration of cancer services, inadequate registries, delays in diagnosis or treatment initiation, and insufficient palliative services. Progress has been made in key areas but remains uneven across the region. An unforeseen challenge, the COVID-19 pandemic, strained all resources, and its negative effect on cancer control is expected to continue for years. In this Series paper, we summarise progress in several aspects of cancer control since 2015, and identify persistent barriers requiring commitment of additional resources to reduce the cancer burden in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Persistent changes to the nasal ciliated epithelium following SARS-CoV2 infection: a longitudinal cohort analysis from FOLLOW-COVID

S55 Figure 1Transmission Electron Micrographs of ciliated epithelial cells 3months- 1 year post-COVID. Red circles represent microtubular subunits assembling during ciliogenesis, the white arrow shows short regenerating cilia. Yellow boxes surround intracytoplasmic cilia seen in 90% post COVID cases and suggestive of a defect in ciliogenesis[Figure omitted. See PDF]ConclusionEpithelial disruption and defects in epithelial regeneration persist for up to 1 year post infection with SARS-CoV-2, irrespective of initial illness severity. Persisting inflammation, or a failure of repair, are possible pathological processes for further exploration.

Inflammatory biomarkers predict clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 infection: results from the PREDICT-COVID19 study

IntroductionCOVID-19 is reported to cause profound systemic inflammation. Anti-inflammatory treatments such as corticosteroids and anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibodies reduce mortality. Identifying inflammatory biomarkers associated with increased morbidity and mortality may allow both prediction of outcomes and identification of further therapeutic targets.MethodsA prospective observational study of patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 admitted to a single centre in Dundee, UK. Patients were enrolled within 96 hours of hospital admission. 45 inflammatory biomarkers were measured in serum using the Olink Target48 proteomic-based biomarker panel. Additional markers were measured by ELISA/immunoassay and enzyme activity assays. Severe disease was defined as the requirement for non-invasive or mechanical ventilation or death within 28 days of admission. Discrimination between groups was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).Results176 patients were included (mean age 64.9 years, SD 13.6), 101 were male (57.4%). 56 patients developed severe disease (31.8%), mortality was 16.5%. Using ROC analysis, the strongest predictors of severity (p<0.0001) were CCL7/MCP3 (AUC 0.78 95%CI 0.70–0.85), IL6 (0.73 95%CI 0.66–0.81), IL15 (0.73 95%CI 0.65–0.81), CXCL10/IP10 (0.73 95%CI 0.65–0.81). Further significant predictors of severity included CXCL11, IL10, CCL2/MCP1 and CSF2/GM-CSF. Predictors of mortality were CXCL10 (0.78 95%CI 0.69–0.86), IL6 (0.76 95%CI 0.67–0.85), IL15 (0.75 95%CI 0.66–0.84), IL10 (0.73 95%CI 0.64–0.82). Further significant predictors of mortality were CXCL9 and CCL7.ConclusionMultiple circulating biomarkers were identified which predicted disease severity and mortality in COVID19, indicating clinical value in measurement upon hospital admission to highlight high-risk patients. Associated biological processes for these proteins included anti-viral and interferon responses and immune cell chemotaxis. In particular, CCL7 and CXCL10, the strongest predictors of severity and mortality in this dataset, are key players in the cytokine storm and immune cell recruitment linked with COVID19. These chemokines are not currently therapeutic targets, highlighting key avenues for further clinical research.

Comparison of inflammatory profiles between COVID-19 and other acute lower respiratory tract infections: Results from the PREDICT-COVID19 study

IntroductionCOVID-19 has been reported to induce a ‘cytokine storm’ distinct from other acute respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Understanding the similarities and differences in inflammatory profiles between SARS-CoV-2 infection and other respiratory infections may aid diagnosis, as well as the potential to repurpose therapies such as steroids and anti-IL-6 receptor antagonists for other respiratory infections.MethodsA prospective observational study of patients in 3 groups 1) PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2) community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) without SARS-CoV-2, and 3) controls hospitalized for reasons other than infection. Patients were enrolled from a single centre in Dundee, UK. Patients were enrolled within 96 hours of hospital admission. 45 inflammatory biomarkers were measured in blood using the Olink target proteomic based biomarker panel. Additional markers were measured by ELISA/immunoassay and enzyme activity assay as appropriate. Discrimination between groups was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).Results294 patients were included (COVID-19 n=176, CAP n=76, controls n=42), mean age 64 (SD±15.2) and 150 subjects were male (51.0%). Using ROC analysis the most discriminating biomarkers for COVID-19 compared to CAP were CXCL-10 (AUC 0.84 95%CI 0.78–0.90 p<0.001), CCL-8 (0.87 95%CI 0.82–0.92, p<0.001), CCL-7 (0.84 95%CI 0.78–0.89, p<0.001), CXCL-11 (0.80 95%CI 0.73–0.88, p<0.001). Further biomarkers included IL-18, IL-7, IL-10 and IL-33. The most discriminating biomarkers for COVID-19 compared to controls were CXCL-10 (0.89 95%CI 0.85–0.93, p<0.001, CCL-7 (0.88 95%CI 0.83–0.92, p<0.001), CCL-8 (0.87 95%CI 0.82–0.92, p<0.001). Further biomarkers included IL-10, CXCL-11 and IL-18. IL-4 was significantly lower in COVID-19 patients compared to controls (0.27 95%CI 0.16–0.38, p<0.001). No significant difference in IL-6 was seen between COVID-19 and CAP (median 21.9pg/ml vs 19.8pg/ml,p=0.59).ConclusionDifferential markers of inflammation were identified between COVID-19, CAP and control samples, indicating distinct immunological pathways. The identification of a similar IL-6 signature between COVID-19 and CAP indicates that IL-6 targeting therapies currently being used to treat COIVD-19 may also be beneficial in the treatment of CAP.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care activities at a Uruguayan mastology teaching unit: Preliminary results

Background: After the government declared a health emergency due to COVID-19 on March, 2020, the Mastology Teaching Unit (UDAM) providing care to breast cancer patients tried to ensure adequate oncological care, and to protect patients from the virus infection and serious complications due to a possible state of immunosuppression. Towards this objective, the Department of Clinical Oncology developed guidelines with some treatment modifications. Objective: To assess the health care activities of the UDAM during the period considered as the “peak” of the pandemic, since its beginning to June 30, 2020. Methods: This is an observational study that collected data from the electronic clinical record system called Oncology Electronic Health Record (HCEO) during the aforementioned period. Results: There werea total of 293 medical appointments (221 in person), through which 131 patients were attended to. The number of medical appointments decreased by 16.7% compared to the same period in 2019 (352 appointments). Of the patients who were attended to during the “peak” period, 109 (83.2%) were on systemic onco-specific treatment and 22 (16.8%) were attended to for disease control. The medical appointments were scheduled to evaluate the continuity of treatment and treatment modifications if necessary (95 patients;72.5%), for disease control (17;12.9%), for first-time consultation (12;9.1%) and to assess paraclinical studies (7;5.3%). The patients were on hormone therapy (HT) (81 patients;74%), chemotherapy (CT) (21;19%), and anti-HER2 therapies (9;8%). A total of 20 treatments were initiated, 14 with HT and 6 with CT. Of the 21 patients on CT, 14 (66.6%) were on adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy. Of these, 9 (64.3%) continued with the same regimen with the addition of prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF), and 5 (35.7%), who were receiving weekly paclitaxel, continued the treatment with no changes. The remaining 7 of 21 patients (33.3%) were on palliative CT. Of these, 2 (28.5%) continued the treatment with the addition of G-CSF, 3 (42.8%) continued with weekly capecitabine or paclitaxel with no treatment changes, and 2 (28.5%) changed their treatment regimen (a less myelosuppressive regimen was selected for one of them and this decision was due to the progression of the disease in the other patient). The 90 patients who were receiving adjuvant, neoadjuvant, or palliative criteria HT and/or anti-HER2 therapies, continued the treatment with no changes Conclusions: Although these are preliminary results, the available evidence suggests that, although medical appointments decreased by approximately 17%, the UDAM was able to maintain its healthcare activities and continued most of the treatments. The most modified treatment was CT, with the addition of prophylactic G-CSF, to avoid myelosuppression and potential complications from COVID-19 infection.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of telephone consultations and the level of satisfaction of patients attending the Unidad Docente Asistencial de Mastología [Mastology Care Teaching Unit] using this method during the COVID health emergency

Background: In March 2020, a health emergency was decreed due to COVID-19 and this produced changes in the organization of health services. One of the objectives of the reorganization that took place was a reduction in face-to-face consultations (FTFC), and the promotion of telephone consultations (TC). Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of TC and the level of satisfaction of patients attending the Mastology Unit using this method during the COVID health emergency. Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional study. A survey was used to assess the effectiveness of TC and the level of satisfaction with the method. Results: Forty-two patients were surveyed, of which 69% were receiving adjuvant treatment and 14.2% palliative treatment. With regard to the effectiveness of TC, 76.1% of those surveyed had their appointment resolved by telephone;78.6% of patients preferred to do the consultation by telephone;97.6% believed that sufficient time was spent and that the timing of the appointment was appropriate. The responses showed a high degree of satisfaction with the care received. The medical care met the expectations of all patients, and 83.3% believed that once normalcy was restored, TC would be an option for their situation. Conclusions: The TC method was evaluated with a high degree of satisfaction and allowed care to be maintained during the emergency. Although it is early to assess the healthcare impact of TC and the method's capacity to resolve issues, preliminary results show that it is a useful and valuable tool in clinical practice during periods of healthcare emergency. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.